Skip to main content
Business Automation

AI Governance & Compliance Checklist

Audit your AI initiatives for data privacy, model governance, human review safeguards, and regulatory compliance.

~5 minDeterministicClient-Safe Privacy
AI Governance Score: 42 out of 100. Maturity: Early Stage. EU AI Act Category: High Risk / Non-Compliant.

12 Governance Verification Checks

Organized across 4 NIST AI RMF 1.0 Core Functions

1. NIST GOVERN: Culture & Accountability

67%

2. NIST MAP: Sensitive Data & IP Guardrails

67%

3. NIST MEASURE: Verification, Logging & Vendors

33%

4. NIST MANAGE: Incident Handling & Risk

0%

Governance Assessment Results

Deterministic Governance Model Active

NIST AI RMF 1.0 & EU AI Act aligned

High-Priority Governance Gaps (2)
  • No incident management response procedure for hallucinations or data leaks
  • Lack of prompt/output audit logging for traceability
Regulatory & Standards AlignmentNIST AI RMF 1.0 & EU AI Act

NIST AI RMF 1.0 Core Functions

EU AI Act: High Risk / Non-Compliant
GOVERN67%

Culture & Accountability

Tool catalog, AI ownership, employee literacy

MAP67%

Context & IP Guardrails

PII protection, confidential data, source code rules

MEASURE33%

Testing & Human Oversight

Mandatory human gates, audit logs, vendor audits

MANAGE0%

Incident Handling & Risk

Incident response, AI disclosure, copyright terms

EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Status:High Risk / Action Required

Fails mandatory EU AI Act Article 14 (Human Oversight) and Article 62 (Post-Market Incident Reporting) controls.

WeakVerified Calculation

AI Governance Maturity: 42/100 (Early Stage)

AI Governance maturity evaluated at 42/100 (Early Stage). 5/12 governance controls are currently operational. Found 2 critical gaps.

Governance Maturity
42/100
Deterministic Scale

NIST AI RMF 1.0 Core Functions Breakdown

Weighted assessment across key technical and business factors

4 Factors
GOVERN: Organizational Governance & Culture
Needs Improvement67/100

2/3 policies, AI ownership roles, and workforce literacy active.

MAP: Sensitive Data & IP Guardrails
Needs Improvement67/100

2/3 data classification, PII, and source code boundaries mapped.

MEASURE: Verification, Logging & Vendors
Critical33/100

1/3 human gates, audit logging, and vendor assessments operational.

MANAGE: Risk Treatment & Incident Handling
Critical0/100

0/3 incident response protocols, AI disclosure, and copyright protections active.

Diagnostic Findings

Automated architectural, economic, and technical observations

Primary StrategyRecommended Action Plan

Establish AI Incident Triage Procedure

Define protocol for isolating compromised credentials, revoking API keys, and handling suspected customer data ingestion.

Immediate Execution Milestones

  • Formulate an emergency key revocation checklist.
  • Define legal counsel and compliance notification SLAs (< 72 hours).
  • Run a tabletop exercise simulating a model output hallucination in billing.

Supplementary Next Steps

Conduct Responsible AI Training Workshop

Train team members on prompt engineering best practices, hallucination verification, and privacy hygiene.

Robonom Enterprise Implementation
AI Governance Assessment: Early Stage (High Risk / Non-Compliant)

Need an enterprise AI governance framework or compliance baseline?

Robonom assists organizations in drafting AI policies, establishing audit gateways, and ensuring EU AI Act / ISO 42001 readiness.

Fixed-scope engineering
Guaranteed delivery milestones
Zero vendor lock-in
Direct consultation with Robonom engineers
Request Governance Advisory Consultation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is shadow AI and why is it a significant corporate liability?

Shadow AI refers to employees using unapproved, personal freemium AI tools and browser extensions for work tasks. Without commercial enterprise agreements, free-tier models may store user prompts for training, exposing proprietary intellectual property and customer PII to unauthorized third parties.

What regulations govern enterprise AI usage?

Key frameworks include the EU AI Act (enforcing transparency and risk categorization), GDPR / CCPA (governing personal data processing in model training and inference), and standard ISO 42001 (Artificial Intelligence Management System).

Why is audit logging essential for enterprise AI?

Centralized audit logging records prompt timestamps, user IDs, model hashes, and outputs. If intellectual property infringement, hallucinated commitments, or security leaks occur, audit logs provide the necessary digital evidence for investigation and defense.